Regulatory Overview
You've heard the rumors.
All public safety agencies must purchase APCO-25 type narrow
band 2-way radios to receive federal funds because the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) guidelines state that all new radio purchases
SHOULD be APCO-25 compliant. Now, let's deal with a few facts and
definitions for the REAL answer! First, let's make a few corrections. The
compliancy issue is based on a standard developed by SAFECOM. This is kind
of like an internal advisory group to DHS. Perhaps a few definitions may
be in order at this time. Let's start with the mission of
SAFECOM.The following is quoted directly from SAFECOM's mission statement. SAFECOM adheres to a bottom-up approach, which means the program relies heavily on local and state emergency response practitioners for input and guidance as it works to define and implement solutions for the interoperability challenge.
As a practitioner-driven program, SAFECOM has developed a governance structure that facilitates the input of local and state emergency response practitioners. Through the Program’s Executive Committee (EC) and Emergency Response Council (ERC), the emergency response community and local, tribal, state, and Federal policy makers provide strategic input to the SAFECOM Program.
The SAFECOM standard, if we understand it correctly is currently based on two factors. The first being that the technical standard developed by APCO (more about this later), generally known as P25 will be the preferred digital interoperable communications standard in the USA. A large number of countries (at least those that have developed a standard) tend to favor a technology known as TETRA. Even in the USA, there are lesser cost digital alternatives that meet the new FCC technical standards applicable through 2018. However, if the user intends to MIGRATE from analog to digital, P25 is the best choice and the ONLY choice recognized by SAFECOM.
The second factor relating to the SAFECOM standard is a recommendation that all statewide systems be based on operation in the 700 MHz band. That is all well and good except for two limiting factors. First, the are a very limited number of potential suppliers, all of which currently offer only high tier expensive radios. Second, and of more importance, is the fact that frequencies will not be available until 2009 when TV broadcasters are scheduled to vacate the band proposed to be used. Lastly, there are a number of competing plans for management of the 700 MHz band when the aforementioned details have been resolved. The bottom line is that the recommendation to use P25 700 MHz as a "standard" is an objective that simply cannot be met at this time.
It is our understanding that the Department of Commerce (DOC), not DHS will have the ultimate responsibility for distribution of funding for interoperable communications. DOC has the option of agreeing or disagreeing with SAFECOM proposed standards - an issue as yet, unaddressed. For now, let's get familiar with the of the terms used in the definition of the proposed standards.
The Associated Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO)
Originally an association of police communications technicians, APCO has grown into a PRIVATE ORGANIZATION that provides a number of services relating to government communications. Notably, APCO is one of several frequency coordinators responsible for coordinating frequency assignments before an application is filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). APCO also has a technical standards group responsible for planning the future needs of police (and more recently public-safety) users. It was through this group that a standard for advanced narrow band communications was developed.
Currently (December
2007), P25 is the only digital technology offered in the USA offering
backwards compatibility with analog systems, and a migration plan for
updating to 6.25 kHz channel spacing and the ability to page and scan both
analog and digital channels.
The
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
The FCC was
established and is governed by the CONGRESS of the United States under the
authority of the Legislative branch. The FCC has been given ALL AUTHORITY
over the operation of ALL communications including broadcast media,
wireless communications of all types of radios INCLUDING Public Safety
communications. It is the FCC that determines the technical operating
standards for communications equipment in the United States and no other
Branch of government - PERIOD! It is the FCC that is responsible for
long term frequency planning and the implementation of narrow band
technology below 512 MHz. in two phases. Phase One requires that all
communications devices used in the United States below 512 MHz. be capable
of operating on frequencies not exceeding a bandwidth of 12.5 kHz. This is
commonly known as the narrowband standard. Until 2013 (maybe), public
safety users may continue to use 25 (wide band) kHz equipment. Phase 2,
which becomes mandatory (maybe) in 2018 would require radios capable of
operating at 6.25 kHz. To say there is a great deal of confusion relating
to these new standards would be a gross understatement! Both the
first and second phases assume radios capable of operating in either an
analog or digital mode with automatic detection and selection of the
incoming signal. Currently, the alternate digital systems (MotoTRBO
and FDMA 6.25 KHz) do NOT have this capability.
Much of the
confusion relates to pressure on the FCC by special interest groups. For
example, the FCC wanted TV Broadcasters to vacate the 700 MHz band
(Channels 60-70) for reassignment to public safety users. The broadcasters
made no effort to comply and continued to be granted extensions to
continue operations through 2008. The result is that 700 MHz frequencies
cannot be assigned in most areas of the US. Then, there is the spectrum
swap crafted by Sprint/Nextel whereby Nextel would give up 800 MHz
frequencies (which allegedly cause interference to public safety users in
the 800 MHz band) and move to the more desirable (for Sprint/Nextel) 1900
MHz band. No one seems to know when, if ever this will happen. In the
meantime, the FCC has focused most of their attention on frequency bands
below 512 MHz where they have attempted to implement the new narrow band
standards. To say that there has been much opposition would again be a
gross understatement. But, confusion or not - It is the FCC that is
responsible for equipment technical standards, not anyone else including
DHS.
As an item of note,
FCC licenses are issued for a term of 10 years. This means that a
license issued in 2008 is good through 2018 REGARDLESS of any upgraded
standards during that period of time.
The Department of
Homeland Security (DHS)
A cabinet level agency, set up
under the authority of the EXECUTIVE branch of our government. There are
two other branches of equal power - Judicial, and Legislative. Legislative
MAKES laws, Judicial INTERPRETS law, and Executive ENFORCES law. It is
important to remember the differing responsibilities of each branch and
that fact that no branch has the authority to usurp the authority of
another REGARDLESS OF THE SITUATION! Our Constitution guarantees an equal
balance of power for obvious reasons. DHS states that any radios funded by
DHS SHOULD be APCO-25 compliant. To meet this loosely worded requirement,
any radio purchased with DHS funding would comply if it is capable of
operating in the 12.5 kHz mode. It does NOT have to be digital and it does
NOT have to operate at 6.25 kHz and it does NOT have to operate at 700 MHz
as proposed by SAFECOM. The perceived intent as that DHS funded
radios should have digital capability, but because of the confusion
associated with the wording, DHS grants have been granted for non-digital
radios operating at 12.5 kHz.
The Department of the Interior (DOI)
The DOI, among other things is
responsible for taking care of federal lands through a subordinate agency
known as the Bureau of Land Management. In this capacity, the DOI has a
close working relationship with the US Fire Administration, who in turn
works closely through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). DOI
through another subordinate agency, the US Forest Service works closely
with State, County, and local fire departments - both paid and volunteer.
It is important to note that DOI is NOT subordinate to DHS, or any other
cabinet level agency or Department. DOI needs coordinated communications
with State, County, and local firefighters for the protection of federal
lands. DOI has some input into the standards applicable to FEMA grants,
mainly dealing with the ability to communicate with DOI personnel using a
commonly accepted standard. At this time, the ONLY requirement is the
ability to communicate at 12.5 KHz (narrow band) using ANALOG radios.
OPTIONALLY, a user can communicate with DOI using 12.5 kHz radios
operating in the digital mode, utilizing radios capable of operating in
both an analog and digital format. See previous
comments.
As an item of note, many US
government agencies such as the US Forest Service are purchasing digital
APCO-25 compliant radios at this time - both as a mandate applying to all
federal agencies, but equally for reasons of economic practicality.
It is safe to say that at some point, all users will have to be 12.5 kHz
digital compliant. Rather than purchasing
12.5 kHz analog radios for current use, the Forest Service chose to skip
the interim step and purchase digital compatible equipment. That makes
sense if the funds are available to purchase radios that typically
cost four times more than an analog equivalent capable of operating
at 12.5 kHz.
M/A-COM, Motorola, etc.
Both Motorola and M/A-COM offer digital trunking systems that are NOT compatible with APCO-25. If you want the trunking capability, you must use equipment incorporating their proprietary protocols. The fact is that no manufacturer really wants a totally open standard. That would be totally contrary to a competitive and profitable marketplace. Those who are waiting for a universal standard that reduce all manufacturers to a common technical standard will have a very long wait.
Summing it all up - So what do you do? The fact is that 12.5 KHz equipment is readily available in analog, analog upgradeable to P25 and P25 digital equipment with backwards compatibility to analog 25 or 12.5 kHz at reasonable cost. Purchase of a 12.5 kHz capable radio today meets FCC requirements from which DHS has scripted their loosely worded requirement for "should" be APCO-25 compatible. Forget about any short term planning in the 700 and 800 MHz bands for now. There are too many issues still up in the air.
Utilization of P25 digital equipment will assure interoperability with federal agencies and other P25 users. It is the ONLY system to consider for those who are planning a gradual phase out of older equipment.
We hope this information has been useful and to the best of our knowledge, it is correct at the time of publication. For additional information, we encourage you to do your own research and not take verbal or written representations by anyone (including us) as being factual. Check it out for yourself. We've given you our opinion and we encourage you to develop your own conclusions through additional research.
*Digital base stations generally provide equal if not better range than 25 kHz stations.
